Insiders’ Perspectives on Democratisation of Classical Music Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5429/2079-3871(2026)v16i1.5enKeywords:
democratisation in classical music production, resistance to democratise, popular vs. classical music production, impact of technology on music genres, recording studiosAbstract
This study employs inductive thematic analysis to examine democratisation in music production—making resources and knowledge more accessible—by comparing classical (CMP) and popular music production (PMP). PMP embraces technological innovations, fostering decentralised tools and platforms for diverse creators. CMP, however, prioritises fidelity to live performance and historical conventions, resisting democratisation due to institutional conservatism and entrenched power dynamics. Using data from 34 qualitative interviews with professionals, the study highlights how educational, institutional, and technical factors slow CMP’s adaptation to technology. While the democratisation of CMP would require cultural shifts and educational reforms, the adoption of select PMP innovations might enhance accessibility without compromising CMP’s traditional values. This research contributes to the underexplored intersection of democratisation and CMP practice. The paper suggests that through implementing hybrid approaches inspired by PMP, CMP could evolve to create more flexible and creative production environments while preserving its rich heritage.
References
Bibliography
Alleyne, M. 2020. Authenticity in Music Production. In The Bloomsbury Handbook of Music Production. London: Bloomsbury: 19-31.
Anthony, B. 2017. Mixing as a Performance: Creative Approaches to the Popular Music Mix Process. Journal on the Art of Record Production 11. https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/mixing-as-a-performance-creative-approaches-to-the-popular-music-mix-process/. Accessed: 3 November 2024.
Auslander, P. 2008. Liveness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938133
Bennett, T. et al. 2008. Tensions of the Musical Field. In Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge: 75-93.
Born, G. and Devine, K. 2015. Music Technology, Gender, and Class: Digitization, Educational and Social Change in Britain. Twentieth-Century Music 12 (2): 135-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572215000018
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Brackett, D. 2016. Categorizing Sound: Genre and Twentieth-Century Popular Music. Oakland, CA.: University of California Press.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burgess, R. J. 2013. The Art of Music Production: The Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Carvalho, A. T. 2012. The Discourse of Home Recording: Authority of ‘Pros’ and the Sovereignty of the Big Studios. Journal on the Art of Record Production 7. https://www.arpjournal.com/asarpwp/the-discourse-of-home-recording-authority-of-%E2%80%9Cpros%E2%80%9D-and-the-sovereignty-of-the-big-studios/. Accessed: 9 January 2025.
Green, L. 2002. How Popular Musicians Learn: a Way Ahead for Music Education. Burlington, VT.: Ashgate.
Hesmondhalgh, D. –
Post-Punk’s Attempt to Democratise the Music Industry: the Success and Failure of Rough Trade. Popular Music 16 (3): 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143000008400
Indie: The Institutional Politics and Aesthetics of a Popular Music Genre. Cultural Studies 13 (1): 34-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/095023899335365
Hesmondhalgh, D., Jones, E. and Rauh, A. 2019. SoundCloud and Bandcamp as Alternative Music Platforms. Social Media + Society 5 (4): 2056305119883429. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883429
Leech-Wilkinson, D. 2020. Challenging Performance: Classical Music Performance Norms and How to Escape Them. Available at: https://challengingperformance.com/the-book-50/. Accessed: 9 January 2025.
Lena, J. C. 2012. Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.
Leyshon, A. 2009. The Software Slump?: Digital Music, the Democratisation of Technology, and the Decline of the Recording Studio Sector within the Musical Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (6): 1309-1331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1068/a40352
McNally, K. and Seay, T. 2020. Studying Recording Techniques. In The Bloomsbury Handbook of Music Production. London: Bloomsbury Academic: 233-247.
Negus, K. Ed. 1999. Music Genres and Corporate Cultures. New York: Routledge.
O’Grady, P. 2021. Sound City and Music from the Outskirts: the De-democratisation of Pop Music Production. Creative Industries Journal 14 (3): 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2020.1839281
Rogers, H., Freitas, J. and Porfírio, J.F. Eds. 2023. YouTube and Music: Online Culture and Everyday Life. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501387302
Taylor, T.D. 2001. Strange Sounds: Music, Technology & Culture. New York, NY.: Routledge.
Théberge, P. 1997. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology. Middletown, CT.: Wesleyan University Press.
Watson, A. 2014. Cultural Production in and Beyond the Recording Studio. New York: Routledge.
Wolfe, P. 2023. Self Production: Creativity and Process, Triggers and Surprise. IASPM Journal 13 (1): 26-44. https://doi.org/10.5429/2079-3871(2023)v13i1.3en
Zagorski-Thomas, S. –
Gesturing Producers and Scratching Musicians. In 3rd Art of Record Production Conference. Brisbane, Australia. https://www.artofrecordproduction.com/aorpjoom/arp-conferences/arp-archive-conference-papers/19-arp-2007/127-zagorski-thomas-2007. Accessed: 9 January 9 2025.
The Musicology of Record Production. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Interviews
Anne-Marie Sylvestre. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 20 February.
Anthony Ritchie. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 19 January.
David Houston. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Wellington, New Zealand, 25 January.
David McCaw. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Wellington, New Zealand, 25 January.
Hamish McKeich. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 4 March.
John Neill. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Wellington, New Zealand, 26 January.
John Will Parks IV. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 13 February.
Kemp English. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Wellington, New Zealand, 23 January.
Kenneth Young. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 1 February.
Martha de Francisco. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 2 July.
Michael Fine. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 8 February.
Michael Houstoun. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 6 February.
Nick Squire. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 10 March.
Padraig Buttner-Schnirer. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 4 April.
Pieter Snapper. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 7 March.
Richard King. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 17 July.
Seray Kalelioğlu. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 26 February.
Tim Dodd. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 26 March.
Toru Kamekawa. 2024. Interviewed by Author, Online, 6 September.
Will Howie. 2023. Interviewed by Author, Online, 27 December.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IASPM Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright, while licensing their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.